What props / projections do you like for tonights Knicks vs 76ers game? What sticks out the most? What are are most conservative picks? What are you looking for? What would you take?
Game context: Knicks are favored heavily on Polymarket — Knicks 74% implied, Knicks -7.5, total 216.5. The biggest prop risk is game script: New York has been dominant recently, going 4-1 last 5 with a +26.8 point differential, while Philly is 3-2 last 5 but -6.6 point differential. If this gets lopsided, Sixers props become fragile.
Expected starters:
| Player | Market Line | Projection | Lean | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karl-Anthony Towns points | 18.5 | 19.6 | Over | Medium |
| Tyrese Maxey points | 24.5 | 27.7 | Over | Medium |
| Joel Embiid rebounds | 8.5 | 7.9 | Under | Medium |
| Jalen Brunson assists | 6.5 | 6.7 | Slight over by projection, but I prefer Under/Pass | Low-Med |
| Karl-Anthony Towns assists | 4.5 | 3.9 | Pass / lean under, despite recent assist spike | Low |
| Josh Hart rebounds | 2.5 | 7.3 | Over, but very expensive | High hit-rate, low value |
| Josh Hart assists | 1.5 | 4.4 | Over, but very expensive | High hit-rate, low value |
| Brunson points | 26.5 | 26.2 | Pass | Low |
| Embiid points | 26.5 | 26.8 | Pass | Low-Med |
These are the safest “just hit” props on the board, but they are priced like it.
Verdict: These are the most conservative picks, but not necessarily the best value. I would only use them if you are comfortable with very low payout / high hit-rate style positions.
This is my favorite normal-priced prop.
The matchup with Embiid is not easy, but the number is fair and the price is not inflated.
Verdict: Playable. This is probably my favorite value-style prop.
This is the Sixers prop I’d be most willing to take.
This is a classic bounce-back spot if Philly keeps it competitive. The concern is Knicks defensive pressure plus blowout risk.
Verdict: Playable, but less conservative than KAT points. Better if you think Philly hangs around.
If you want the safest options, I’d rank them:
Most conservative hit-rate angle. The line is extremely low versus his role and projection.
Also very conservative. He projects above 4 assists and had 6 yesterday.
Best blend of conservative and reasonable price. Not as automatic as Hart’s low lines, but much better value.
This one is more matchup/script-based:
Does Philly look like they can keep this close?
If yes, Maxey points over and Embiid points become more playable. If not, I want Knicks-side props or Hart low-line overs.
Towns minutes expectation
He played only 20 minutes yesterday, but if he’s back near 30, KAT over 18.5 points is strong.
Brunson assist market movement
Brunson’s line is 6.5 assists, projection 6.7, but last 5 is only 5.2 APG and he had just 3 assists vs Philly yesterday. I would not chase the over unless the price improves.
Whether Hart’s ultra-low lines remain available
They are conservative, but at 95c-type pricing, you need to decide if you want safety or value.
Karl-Anthony Towns over 18.5 points — Medium confidence
Best balance of price, projection, and role.
Joel Embiid under 8.5 rebounds — Medium confidence
Projection is under, season average is under, Knicks rebound well, and last matchup was poor for Embiid on the glass.
Tyrese Maxey over 24.5 points — Medium confidence, higher variance
I like the projection gap, but it depends more on Philly staying competitive.
Karl-Anthony Towns over 18.5 points is my favorite actual value play.
If you want the most conservative pick regardless of price, it’s Josh Hart over 2.5 rebounds, but I would not size it aggressively because the market is already pricing it as highly likely.
Assume you're not on Polymarket, using your projections, what would you say is the most like to hit? Highest confidence based on projections
If we ignore Polymarket pricing and just grade by projection vs line, the most likely to hit are the low-threshold Josh Hart props. They are not necessarily the best payout, but they are the cleanest projection edges.
| Rank | Prop | Line | Projection | Edge | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Josh Hart over rebounds | 2.5 | 7.3 | +4.8 | Highest |
| 2 | Josh Hart over assists | 1.5 | 4.4 | +2.9 | Very high |
| 3 | Josh Hart over points | 2.5 | 11.4 | +8.9 | Very high if that line exists |
| 4 | Tyrese Maxey over rebounds | 3.5 | 4.2 | +0.7 | Medium-high |
| 5 | Tyrese Maxey over assists | 5.5 | 6.4 | +0.9 | Medium |
| 6 | Karl-Anthony Towns over points | 18.5 | 19.6 | +1.1 | Medium |
| 7 | Joel Embiid under rebounds | 8.5 | 7.9 | +0.6 to under | Medium |
| 8 | Karl-Anthony Towns under assists | 4.5 | 3.9 | +0.6 to under | Medium-low |
This is the clearest projection mismatch.
This is the most conservative prop on the board. The only real way it loses is foul trouble, injury, or a weird blowout/minutes game. Even in reduced minutes yesterday, Hart still got to 8 boards.
Verdict: Highest-confidence pick.
Also extremely strong by projection.
Hart does not need usage to hit this. He just needs normal connector minutes, and with Brunson drawing attention, Hart can pick up easy secondary assists.
Verdict: Very conservative. Slightly behind rebounds because assists can be more teammate-shot dependent.
If this line is actually available anywhere, it is obviously projection-friendly.
Even with a low-usage role, 2.5 points is extremely low for a 30-minute starter. If a real book has this line, it would be one of the safest hits.
Verdict: Very high confidence if available, but I would expect most non-Polymarket books to have a much higher line.
This is my favorite if you want something that feels like a normal sportsbook-style prop rather than a very low Hart threshold.
The projection edge is not massive, but the case is clean: if KAT gets closer to 30 minutes instead of 20, 19+ points is very live. He also has enough free-throw and three-point paths to get there without needing monster usage.
Verdict: Best blend of realistic line + projection edge.
This one quietly stands out.
I actually prefer this to Maxey points if we are talking pure hit probability. Points require efficiency and Knicks defensive pressure matters. Rebounds are less sensitive to shooting efficiency.
Verdict: Solid conservative-ish secondary play.
Projection likes it, but not as much as rebounds.
The concern is recent assist form is slightly down, and if Philly struggles offensively, assists can die even if Maxey plays big minutes.
Verdict: Playable, but I prefer Maxey rebounds over assists.
This is my favorite Sixers under.
The only concern is that his recent 10-game average is 8.4 RPG, so this is not a huge gap. Still, the Knicks matchup and game script make the under logical.
Verdict: Medium confidence. I’d take it before Embiid points.
Karl-Anthony Towns over 18.5 points
Josh Hart over 2.5 rebounds
If I had to pick one purely based on projection and likelihood to hit, it is Hart over 2.5 rebounds. It has the biggest cushion relative to his role, minutes, season average, last-10 form, and last matchup.
Avoid the lines, just use your projections
Got it — no lines, just projection-based confidence.
| Rank | Player / Stat | My Projection | Confidence | Why it sticks out |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Josh Hart rebounds | 7.3 REB | Highest | Stable role, strong rebounding identity, not usage-dependent |
| 2 | Josh Hart assists | 4.4 AST | Very high | Connector role, benefits from Brunson/KAT gravity |
| 3 | Tyrese Maxey points | 27.7 PTS | High | Clear No. 1 perimeter scorer, huge minutes expectation |
| 4 | Jalen Brunson points | 26.2 PTS | High | Knicks offense still runs through him late-clock and half-court |
| 5 | Joel Embiid points | 26.8 PTS | Medium-high | Strong raw projection, but health/minutes/game script risk |
| 6 | Karl-Anthony Towns points | 19.6 PTS | Medium-high | Efficient scoring profile, but usage can swing depending on Brunson flow |
| 7 | Tyrese Maxey assists | 6.4 AST | Medium | Role supports it, but teammate shot-making is the variable |
| 8 | Joel Embiid rebounds | 7.9 REB | Medium | Projection is modest for him; Knicks/Hart/KAT can suppress boards |
| 9 | Karl-Anthony Towns assists | 3.9 AST | Medium-low | Can pop if doubled, but not as stable as scoring |
This is the cleanest projection on the board for me. Hart’s rebounding is not dependent on play calls, usage, or shot volume. He just needs minutes, and his role naturally puts him around the ball.
Projection: 7.3 rebounds
Confidence: Highest
Also very clean. Hart is one of the Knicks’ best “connector” players. He grabs, pushes, swings, and finds shooters. His assist projection is strong because he doesn’t need to dominate the ball to create them.
Projection: 4.4 assists
Confidence: Very high
If Philly keeps this competitive, Maxey scoring is my favorite Sixers angle. He has the cleanest path to volume, should play heavy minutes, and has the ball enough to survive a tough matchup.
Projection: 27.7 points
Confidence: High, but game-script sensitive
Brunson’s projection is strong, but I trust it slightly less than Hart rebounds/assists because scoring efficiency and game flow matter more. Still, in a Knicks win script, Brunson usage is very stable.
Projection: 26.2 points
Confidence: High
KAT is more of a “good projection, moderate confidence” play. He can get there efficiently, but the Knicks have enough offensive options that his shot volume can fluctuate.
Projection: 19.6 points
Confidence: Medium-high
If I’m ignoring price and lines completely, the best projection-based plays are:
The most conservative categories are:
Hart’s rebounds and assists are the safest because they are role-based rather than shot-making-based.
If I had to build a projection-only card, I’d take:
Josh Hart rebounds
That’s the one I’d be most comfortable with purely based on expected role, minutes, and repeatability.
Would you take over or under on these?
Yes — using only my projections / confidence, here’s how I’d play the direction.
| Player / Stat | Projection | My Direction | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Hart rebounds | 7.3 | Over | Highest |
| Josh Hart assists | 4.4 | Over | Very high |
| Tyrese Maxey points | 27.7 | Over | High |
| Jalen Brunson points | 26.2 | Over / slight over | Medium-high |
| Karl-Anthony Towns points | 19.6 | Over | Medium-high |
| Tyrese Maxey assists | 6.4 | Over | Medium |
| Joel Embiid points | 26.8 | Slight over, but not my favorite | Medium |
| Joel Embiid rebounds | 7.9 | Under | Medium |
| Karl-Anthony Towns assists | 3.9 | Under / pass | Medium-low |
This is my strongest projection-side play. Rebounds are role-based, not shot-making dependent, and Hart’s minutes/rebounding role are very stable.
Also very strong. He does not need high usage to get there. His path is grab-and-go chances, swing passes, and Brunson/KAT gravity creating assist opportunities.
Maxey has the cleanest Sixers scoring path. If Philly keeps the game competitive, he should carry huge usage.
I like this more than KAT assists. His scoring projection is more stable than his playmaking projection.
This is the main under I’d consider. His rebounding projection is not dominant, Knicks have strong glass pieces with Hart/KAT/OG, and if the game script tilts toward New York, Embiid’s minutes/rebounding chances get shakier.
If I’m choosing the cleanest plays:
Josh Hart rebounds over is the most conservative.
Josh Hart assists over is second.
After that, I’d go Maxey points over if you believe Philly stays competitive.
Can you show me Jalen Brunson ppg for his last 5?
Jalen Brunson is averaging 27.2 PPG over his last 5 games.
| Date | Opponent | Result | Points | Minutes | FG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4 | vs 76ers | W 137-98 | 35 | 31 | 12-18 |
| Apr 30 | @ Hawks | W 140-89 | 17 | 29 | 6-12 |
| Apr 28 | vs Hawks | W 126-97 | 39 | 35 | 15-23 |
| Apr 25 | @ Hawks | W 114-98 | 19 | 34 | 7-18 |
| Apr 23 | @ Hawks | L 108-109 | 26 | 40 | 11-23 |
Last 5 average: 27.2 points
Season average: 26.1 points
So he’s running slightly above his season scoring average lately, with two big ceiling games: 39 vs Atlanta and 35 vs Philly.
Show me josh hart rebounds / assists for last 5 games
Josh Hart over his last 5 games:
| Date | Opponent | Result | Minutes | Rebounds | Assists |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4 | vs 76ers | W 137-98 | 26 | 8 | 6 |
| Apr 30 | @ Hawks | W 140-89 | 27 | 5 | 2 |
| Apr 28 | vs Hawks | W 126-97 | 30 | 5 | 4 |
| Apr 25 | @ Hawks | W 114-98 | 31 | 9 | 3 |
| Apr 23 | @ Hawks | L 108-109 | 40 | 9 | 6 |
| Stat | Last 5 Avg | Season Avg |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds | 7.2 RPG | 7.5 RPG |
| Assists | 4.2 APG | 4.8 APG |
Hart’s rebounds have been very stable: 5+ rebounds in all 5, with 8, 5, 5, 9, 9.
His assists are a little more variable, but still solid: 2+ assists in all 5, with 6, 2, 4, 3, 6.
Can you graph each of those?
Here are Josh Hart’s rebounds and assists graphed across his last 5 games.
Rebounds: 9, 9, 5, 5, 8
Assists: 6, 3, 4, 2, 6
If I’m ranking the two purely by confidence, I’d still trust Hart rebounds slightly more than Hart assists.
Can you do Jalen Brunson's ppg for the last 5? How does Phillys defense impact any of these projections / o/u ?
One extra defensive-context note on the Philly guard matchups: their likely Brunson defenders have not been especially disruptive lately by box-score activity.
| Defender | Last 5 MPG | Last 5 SPG | Last 5 BPG | Last 5 Stocks | Season Stocks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyrese Maxey | 38.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.5 |
| VJ Edgecombe | 37.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.9 |
| Quentin Grimes | 24.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
That supports the same read: Brunson points over is viable, because Philly’s guard group has been below its season disruption level recently. The main risk is not one specific defender shutting him down — it’s game script / blowout minutes and Philly sending extra help.
For the overall O/U lean:
Brunson’s last-5 scoring trend is strong at 27.2 PPG, and Philly’s recent guard defensive activity does not make me downgrade him much.
As an advanced bettor, I want to dig deeper. Pleaseanswer the following: 1) Has there been any line movment on KAT over 18.5 points and is it sharp or publc money? 2) Does Knicks slower half-court pace hurt AT volume? 3) How has Brunson scored in blowout winsvs close games in his last 5 - does he get pulled ealy? 4) Does the Knicks team rebound rate vs Philly tis season suppress Embiid boards enough for confidene on under 8.5? 5) Any injury or minutes concern forKAT tonight after only 20 minutes yesterday? 6) Whatare Maxey scoring splits when Philly trails by 10+ -does usage go up or does he disappear? 7) If Knicks cover -7.5, which individual props are most correlated to hit as a result?
As an advanced bettor, I want to dig deeper. Pleaseanswer the following: 1) Has there been any line movment on KAT over 18.5 points and is it sharp or publc money? 2) Does Knicks slower half-court pace hurt AT volume? 3) How has Brunson scored in blowout winsvs close games in his last 5 - does he get pulled ealy? 4) Does the Knicks team rebound rate vs Philly tis season suppress Embiid boards enough for confidene on under 8.5? 5) Any injury or minutes concern forKAT tonight after only 20 minutes yesterday? 6) Whatare Maxey scoring splits when Philly trails by 10+ -does usage go up or does he disappear? 7) If Knicks cover -7.5, which individual props are most correlated to hit as a result?
Sorry, there was an error processing your request. Please try again.
Does Knicks slower half-court pace hurt AT volume? 3) How has Brunson scored in blowout winsvs close games in his last 5 - does he get pulled ealy? 4) Does the Knicks team rebound rate vs Philly tis season suppress Embiid boards enough for confidene on under 8.5? 5) Any injury or minutes concern forKAT tonight after only 20 minutes yesterday? 6) Whatare Maxey scoring splits when Philly trails by 10+ -does usage go up or does he disappear? 7) If Knicks cover -7.5, which individual props are most correlated to hit as a result?
A little, but not enough for me to downgrade KAT scoring heavily.
The Knicks are not a pure pace/transition team. Their best offense is more half-court: Brunson creation, KAT spacing/post touches, Hart connective passing, OG/Bridges spot-up/cut chances. That can reduce raw possession volume, but it also makes KAT’s touches more intentional.
For KAT specifically:
| KAT Recent Form | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Minutes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | 20.1 | 11.8 | 3.0 | 31.0 |
| Last 10 | 18.8 | 10.8 | 5.7 | 30.4 |
| Last 5 | 17.2 | 11.6 | 7.2 | 29.1 |
| Projection | 19.6 | 11.7 | 3.9 | 30.8 |
The bigger issue is not pace. It is usage distribution. Brunson can dominate late-clock possessions, and KAT’s assists have spiked recently, meaning he may be used more as a hub instead of purely as a finisher.
My read:
Yes, he can lose late minutes in blowouts, but the last 5 show something important: he can still get his scoring done before the pull.
| Date | Game | Margin | Minutes | Points | Game Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4 vs PHI | W 137-98 | +39 | 31 | 35 | Blowout win |
| Apr 30 @ ATL | W 140-89 | +51 | 29 | 17 | Blowout win |
| Apr 28 vs ATL | W 126-97 | +29 | 35 | 39 | Blowout win |
| Apr 25 @ ATL | W 114-98 | +16 | 34 | 19 | Comfortable win |
| Apr 23 @ ATL | L 108-109 | -1 | 40 | 26 | Close game |
| Split | Games | Avg Minutes | Avg Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blowout/comfortable wins, 15+ margin | 4 | 32.3 | 27.5 |
| Huge blowout wins, 29+ margin | 3 | 31.7 | 30.3 |
| Close game | 1 | 40.0 | 26.0 |
Takeaway: Brunson does get pulled earlier in blowouts, but it has not killed his scoring. He had 35 in 31 minutes vs Philly and 39 in 35 minutes vs Atlanta.
The risk is not simply “Knicks blowout = Brunson under.” The risk is more specific: if the Knicks blow them out without needing Brunson’s scoring, like the 17-point game in 29 minutes.
My read: Brunson points is still an over-lean by role, but not as conservative as Hart rebounds/assists because it depends on shot volume and whether Philly forces Brunson to keep attacking.
This is more mixed than I’d like for a high-confidence under.
The case for the Embiid rebound under:
But the counterpoint is real:
| Embiid vs Knicks Split | Games | RPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Season vs Knicks | 2 | 10.5 | 34.7 |
| Most recent vs Knicks | 1 | 4 | 25 |
So the Knicks’ team rebounding profile supports the under, but Embiid has already shown he can clear a strong rebounding number against them when minutes are normal.
My read:
I still lean Embiid rebounds under, but I would downgrade it from “confident” to medium confidence. The under is more about game script/minutes risk + Knicks glass strength than a clean matchup suppression edge.
If Philly keeps it close and Embiid plays 34-36 minutes, the under becomes much less comfortable.
No listed injury concern right now. KAT is in the expected starting lineup, and there are no active Knicks injury flags showing meaningful missing production.
The 20 minutes look more like game-script related than an injury signal:
| KAT Last 5 | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs PHI | 20 | 17 | 6 | 6 |
| @ ATL | 28 | 12 | 11 | 10 |
| vs ATL | 34 | 16 | 14 | 6 |
| @ ATL | 29 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
| @ ATL | 34 | 21 | 17 | 4 |
Season minutes: 31.0 MPG
Last 10: 30.4 MPG
Projection: 30.8 minutes
My read: No injury downgrade. The only minutes concern is blowout risk, not health. If the game is competitive, I expect him closer to 30 than 20.
The exact “trailing by 10+” split is not available in the current player split set, so I’m using a game-script proxy: Maxey’s recent production in Philly losses/blowout environments and his role/minutes profile.
Here is the useful context:
| Maxey Recent Form | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Minutes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season | 28.3 | 4.1 | 6.6 | 38.1 |
| Last 10 | 25.3 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 38.2 |
| Last 5 | 24.0 | 5.6 | 5.0 | 38.9 |
| Projection | 27.7 | 4.2 | 6.4 | 38.2 |
Recent game log:
| Game | Minutes | Points | Assists | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs NYK | 27 | 13 | 2 | Blowout loss |
| vs BOS | 45 | 30 | 7 | Competitive/heavy minutes |
| vs BOS | 40 | 30 | 5 | Heavy minutes |
| vs BOS | 43 | 25 | 5 | Heavy minutes |
| vs BOS | 40 | 22 | 6 | Heavy minutes |
Interpretation:
Maxey’s usage should rise when Philly trails because he is their best pace-pusher and perimeter creator. But in a true blowout, the problem is not usage — it is minutes getting clipped and efficiency falling against set defense.
So it is not “Maxey disappears when trailing.” It is more:
My read: Maxey points over is good if you think Philly keeps it within striking distance. If your base script is Knicks cover comfortably, I would prefer Maxey rebounds or avoid Maxey points.
If Knicks cover, I want props that benefit from a Knicks-control script and do not require a 42-minute grind.
| Rank | Prop Angle | Direction | Correlation to Knicks Cover | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Josh Hart rebounds | Over | Strong | Knicks control usually means missed Philly shots + Hart defensive boards |
| 2 | Josh Hart assists | Over | Strong | Hart benefits from Knicks ball movement and transition/semi-transition chances |
| 3 | KAT points | Over | Medium-strong | Knicks efficient offense likely includes KAT scoring inside/out |
| 4 | Brunson points | Over | Medium | Works if Brunson leads the scoring push, but can lose 4Q minutes |
| 5 | Embiid rebounds | Under | Medium | If Knicks control pace/glass and Philly trails, Embiid boards/minutes become shakier |
| 6 | Maxey assists | Under/Pass | Medium | Knicks cover can mean Philly shot-making struggles, reducing assist conversion |
| 7 | Maxey points | Mixed | Low/fragile | Could rise from comeback usage, but blowout minutes hurt |
Best Knicks-cover prop stack:
Brunson points over is correlated if the cover comes through Brunson shot-making. But it is less clean than Hart because Brunson can score 27+ in three quarters or finish with 19-22 if the Knicks win through balance.
Josh Hart rebounds over
This is the cleanest angle. It benefits from Knicks defense, missed Philly shots, Hart’s role, and a Knicks-cover script.
Josh Hart assists over
If New York’s offense is flowing and Philly is overhelping on Brunson/KAT, Hart’s connector role fits perfectly.
KAT points over
No injury concern, 20 minutes last game looks blowout-driven, and the projection still sits around 19.6 points.
Embiid rebounds under
I still lean under, but I would not call it high confidence because Embiid’s season split vs Knicks is 10.5 RPG. The under is more script-based than matchup-proof.
Maxey points over
Good if Philly competes. Risky if Knicks cover comfortably. If your primary bet is Knicks -7.5, Maxey points is not the cleanest correlated partner.