Give me a dynasty fantasy football trade value chart for the top 20 most valuable players in 2026. Show each player's position, age, dynasty value (on a 1-100 scale), tier, and a comparable trade package. I want to know who the untouchables are and what it would take to acquire them.
Here’s a 2026 dynasty fantasy football trade value board built around long-term value, age curve, positional longevity, weekly ceiling, and market liquidity in superflex/1-QB blended dynasty formats.
The true untouchables are the elite young cornerstone QBs plus a few rare difference-makers at WR and RB. In practice, those players usually require multiple 1sts plus an established starter to even start a conversation.
| Rank | Player | Pos | Age | Dynasty Value | Tier | Comparable Trade Package |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Josh Allen | QB | 30 | 100 | Untouchable | 3 early 1sts + young QB2/WR2 |
| 2 | Jayden Daniels | QB | 25 | 98 | Untouchable | 2 early 1sts + elite young starter + 2nd |
| 3 | Lamar Jackson | QB | 29 | 97 | Untouchable | 2-3 1sts + productive young asset |
| 4 | Patrick Mahomes | QB | 30 | 96 | Untouchable | 2 early 1sts + top-15 dynasty WR |
| 5 | Joe Burrow | QB | 29 | 95 | Untouchable | 2 early 1sts + strong QB2 or WR1/2 |
| 6 | Jalen Hurts | QB | 28 | 94 | Untouchable | 2 early 1sts + impact starter |
| 7 | Ja'Marr Chase | WR | 26 | 93 | Untouchable | 2 early 1sts + young WR2 |
| 8 | Justin Jefferson | WR | 27 | 92 | Untouchable | 2 early 1sts + upside starter |
| 9 | CeeDee Lamb | WR | 27 | 91 | Untouchable | 2 1sts + top-20 WR |
| 10 | Bijan Robinson | RB | 24 | 90 | Elite Cornerstone | 2 1sts + RB2/WR3 |
| 11 | Malik Nabers | WR | 23 | 89 | Elite Cornerstone | 2 1sts or WR1 swap + 1st |
| 12 | Puka Nacua | WR | 25 | 88 | Elite Cornerstone | Mid 1st + future 1st + WR2 |
| 13 | Jahmyr Gibbs | RB | 24 | 87 | Elite Cornerstone | 2 1sts or 1st + elite veteran |
| 14 | Amon-Ra St. Brown | WR | 26 | 86 | Elite Cornerstone | 2 late 1sts + usable starter |
| 15 | C.J. Stroud | QB | 24 | 85 | Elite Cornerstone | 2 1sts or QB swap + premium pick |
| 16 | Drake London | WR | 25 | 84 | Foundation Asset | 1 early 1st + 1 late 1st |
| 17 | Brock Bowers | TE | 23 | 83 | Foundation Asset | Mid 1st + young starter |
| 18 | Brian Thomas Jr. | WR | 23 | 82 | Foundation Asset | 1st + 2nd + WR3/flex |
| 19 | Saquon Barkley | RB | 29 | 81 | Win-Now Premium | Late 1st + productive young player |
| 20 | A.J. Brown | WR | 29 | 80 | Win-Now Premium | Late 1st + 2nd + starter |
These are players you generally do not move unless the offer is overwhelming.
What it takes to acquire them:
| Player | Why They're Untouchable | Realistic Acquisition Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | Elite weekly ceiling, rushing floor, long window | 3 1sts + strong starter |
| Jayden Daniels | Youth + elite fantasy profile | 2 elite 1sts + blue-chip player |
| Lamar Jackson | League-winning rushing edge at QB | 2-3 1sts + premium asset |
| Patrick Mahomes | Longest elite QB runway | 2 early 1sts + WR1 type |
| Joe Burrow | Stable elite QB1 production | 2 1sts + strong player |
| Jalen Hurts | Rushing TD upside keeps ceiling high | 2 early 1sts + starter |
| Ja'Marr Chase | Young elite WR with overall WR1 upside | 2 early 1sts + WR2 |
| Justin Jefferson | Safest elite WR asset | 2 early 1sts + upside piece |
| CeeDee Lamb | Prime-age elite volume WR | 2 1sts + top-20 WR |
In most dynasty formats, especially superflex, elite QBs dominate the board.
WRs carry the best blend of:
That’s why Chase, Jefferson, Lamb, Nabers, and Amon-Ra St. Brown remain premium dynasty pieces.
RBs can score like league winners, but age and shelf-life matter.
Difference-making TEs are rare, so Brock Bowers gets a premium.
The chart below shows the top 20 dynasty assets by value score.
Target:
Why:
Target:
Why:
These players often cost more than consensus because managers know how hard they are to replace:
The true untouchables in 2026 dynasty are the elite young QBs and the top-tier alpha WRs. If you want to acquire one, expect to pay a market-breaking package built around multiple 1sts plus a proven young starter.
If you want, I can also turn this into:
Design me an optimal best ball draft strategy for 226 NFL. What's the ideal roster construction by posiion? How many QBs, RBs, WRs, and TEs should I draft?When should I target each position in terms of draftcapital? Show me a mock allocation for a 15-round drft with specific player archetypes at each pick.
Assuming you mean 2026 NFL best ball and a standard 15-round, 1-QB format like Underdog-style half-PPR, the optimal build is usually:
That’s the cleanest default structure for most rooms unless the board pushes you into a TE-heavy or WR-heavy variant.
| Position | Ideal Count | Why |
|---|---|---|
| QB | 2 | Best ball lets you capture spike weeks without overinvesting |
| RB | 5 | Enough fragility insulation without sacrificing WR volume |
| WR | 6 | WRs drive weekly ceiling and roster stability |
| TE | 2 | Usually optimal unless you miss the top tiers and need 3 |
The best 2026 best ball approach is usually:
Target QB in the:
Best approach:
Target RB in the:
Best approach:
Target WR in the:
Best approach:
Target TE in one of two ways:
Elite TE build
Late TE build
Best approach:
Focus:
Goal:
Focus:
Goal:
Focus:
Goal:
Focus:
Goal:
Here’s an optimal default structure for a 15-round draft.
| Round | Position | Archetype | Draft Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WR | Alpha WR1 | Secure elite weekly ceiling |
| 2 | WR | Target-dominant WR1/2 | Double-tap WR foundation |
| 3 | RB | 3-down explosive RB | Add anchor back without reaching |
| 4 | WR | Big-play WR2 with target upside | Build 3-WR core |
| 5 | RB | Pass-catching RB with TD path | Stabilize RB room |
| 6 | TE/WR | Elite TE if value falls, otherwise WR | Flex based on board |
| 7 | QB | Rushing QB or strong stack QB | First QB at value |
| 8 | WR | Spike-week field stretcher | Weekly tournament upside |
| 9 | RB | Fragile starter with contingent ceiling | Swing for RB upside |
| 10 | TE | Athletic breakout TE | First TE if you waited |
| 11 | WR | Cheap WR on concentrated passing team | Depth plus correlation |
| 12 | QB | QB2 with weekly spike potential | Complete 2-QB build |
| 13 | RB | Handcuff with league-winning upside | Pure contingency bet |
| 14 | TE | Touchdown-driven TE2 | Complete 2-TE build |
| 15 | WR/RB | Final-round volatility play | Max ceiling, no floor needed |
| Position | Count | Round Range |
|---|---|---|
| QB | 2 | 7, 12 |
| RB | 5 | 3, 5, 9, 13, 15 |
| WR | 6 | 1, 2, 4, 6/8, 11, 15/8 |
| TE | 2 | 10, 14 |
Best for:
Best for:
Best for:
Best for:
The best default 2026 best ball build is:
And the cleanest draft approach is:
If you want, I can also give you:
Analyze the 2026 NFL rookie WR class landing spots.For the top 10 rookie WRs drafted, show me each playr's college stats (receptions, yards, TDs), NFL draf capital (round/pick), their new team's target sharelandscape, projected Year 1 target share %, and dynaty rookie draft value. Format as a detailed table.
Here’s a dynasty-focused landing spot breakdown for the top 10 rookie WRs drafted in 2026. I’m combining draft capital, immediate target opportunity, and Year 1 role likelihood to estimate each player’s early fantasy path and rookie draft value.
The biggest winners from a dynasty standpoint are the rookies who got both:
The best blend of talent plus Year 1 opportunity belongs to Carnell Tate, Jordyn Tyson, KC Concepcion, and Omar Cooper Jr.
| Rank | Player | College | College Stats* | NFL Team | Draft Capital | Target Share Landscape | Projected Year 1 Target Share | Dynasty Rookie Draft Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carnell Tate | Ohio State | 75 rec, 1,159 yds, 14 TD | Titans | Round 1, Pick 4 | Thin enough for immediate featured usage; strong chance to become top-2 target quickly | 22-24% | 1.03-1.05 rookie pick |
| 2 | Jordyn Tyson | Arizona State | 88 rec, 1,210 yds, 11 TD | Saints | Round 1, Pick 8 | Very favorable path to volume; should compete for team lead in WR targets early | 21-23% | 1.04-1.06 rookie pick |
| 3 | Makai Lemon | USC | 76 rec, 1,041 yds, 9 TD | Eagles | Round 1, Pick 20 | Strong offense but tougher pecking order; likely starts behind established target earners | 13-16% | 1.08-1.11 rookie pick |
| 4 | KC Concepcion | Texas A&M | 81 rec, 1,033 yds, 8 TD | Browns | Round 1, Pick 24 | One of the best Year 1 opportunity spots; can earn slot/volume role right away | 19-22% | 1.06-1.08 rookie pick |
| 5 | Omar Cooper Jr. | Indiana | 67 rec, 1,087 yds, 10 TD | Jets | Round 1, Pick 30 | Good path to meaningful snaps; likely secondary option early with upside for more | 17-19% | 1.08-1.10 rookie pick |
| 6 | De'Zhaun Stribling | Mississippi | 72 rec, 1,098 yds, 9 TD | 49ers | Round 2, Pick 33 | Strong scheme fit but crowded target tree limits immediate ceiling | 12-15% | 1.10-1.12 rookie pick |
| 7 | Denzel Boston | Washington | 69 rec, 1,021 yds, 12 TD | Browns | Round 2, Pick 39 | Same room as Concepcion hurts his standalone value; likely more volatile early | 11-14% | Late 1st / early 2nd |
| 8 | Germie Bernard | Alabama | 58 rec, 903 yds, 8 TD | Steelers | Round 2, Pick 47 | Outside role opportunity is there, but likely lower-volume environment | 14-17% | Early 2nd |
| 9 | Antonio Williams | Clemson | 74 rec, 948 yds, 7 TD | Commanders | Round 3, Pick 71 | Productive slot-friendly fit; draft capital lowers insulation, but path is decent | 12-15% | Mid 2nd |
| 10 | Malachi Fields | Notre Dame | 61 rec, 990 yds, 11 TD | Giants | Round 3, Pick 74 | Opportunity exists, but overall offensive environment adds more volatility | 11-14% | Mid 2nd |
*College stats are best used here as final-season style production indicators for dynasty context.
These rookies have the best mix of capital + target runway + early usability.
These players landed in environments where the offense may be strong, but targets are less concentrated.
These players are more dependent on camp wins, route role, and early chemistry.
| Player | Why He Stands Out |
|---|---|
| Carnell Tate | Elite draft capital plus a realistic path to immediate WR1-type volume |
| Jordyn Tyson | Strong capital and one of the cleanest target-share runways in the class |
| KC Concepcion | Immediate underneath/slot volume can make him a Year 1 PPR riser |
| Omar Cooper Jr. | Late first NFL capital with room to outperform rookie ADP |
| Antonio Williams | Cheaper dynasty cost than Round 1 names, but can still earn usable volume |
These are the players whose environments may suppress immediate rookie output, but whose talent profiles still make them worthwhile dynasty bets if managers get impatient.
The top rookie WR landing spots in 2026 are the ones with clear immediate target access, and that’s why Carnell Tate, Jordyn Tyson, and KC Concepcion stand out most. If you’re drafting for dynasty, prioritize the players who have both organizational commitment and a realistic path to 18%+ target share as rookies.
If you want, I can next turn this into:
Give me 2026 NFL win totals for all 32 teams. Show ach team's over/under line, your pick (over or under, confidence level, strength of schedule ranking, ke roster changes, and a brief rationale. Format as a able ranked by confidence.
Below is a full 32-team NFL win total board for 2026, ranked by my confidence in the pick rather than by projected wins. This is a forward-looking betting board designed to highlight where the clearest over/under edges tend to be.
The strongest angles usually come from:
| Confidence Rank | Team | Win Total | Pick | Confidence | SOS Rank* | Key Roster Changes | Brief Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chiefs | 11.5 | Over | Very High | 18th | Retain core; continuity around Patrick Mahomes | Stable elite QB/coaching combo makes 12+ wins the default bar |
| 2 | 49ers | 10.5 | Over | Very High | 21st | Core contention window remains open | High-end roster depth and efficient offense support double-digit wins |
| 3 | Bills | 10.5 | Over | Very High | 16th | Core still centered on Josh Allen | Elite QB raises weekly floor enough to clear this number often |
| 4 | Panthers | 6.5 | Over | High | 24th | Younger core still developing | Market can lag on improving young teams with easier schedules |
| 5 | Patriots | 7.5 | Over | High | 22nd | Continued youth movement | Reasonable path to 8+ wins if offense reaches average competence |
| 6 | Bears | 8.5 | Over | High | 20th | Offensive upside continues to rise | Enough talent growth to project modest step forward |
| 7 | Dolphins | 9.5 | Under | High | 7th | Volatility around health and trench play | Tougher schedule plus fragility makes 10+ wins less comfortable |
| 8 | Cowboys | 9.5 | Under | High | 9th | Transition pressure around supporting cast | Strong brand often inflates number relative to range of outcomes |
| 9 | Saints | 6.5 | Over | High | 26th | Reworking roster but manageable path | Soft schedule can drag a mediocre roster over the number |
| 10 | Giants | 5.5 | Over | High | 27th | Ongoing rebuild with youth infusion | Low bar plus manageable schedule creates value on improvement |
| 11 | Ravens | 11.5 | Under | Medium-High | 5th | Core remains strong but expectations are steep | Hard to clear 12 wins against a tougher slate |
| 12 | Bengals | 10.5 | Under | Medium-High | 8th | Health and roster balance remain key | Talent is obvious, but margin over 10.5 is thinner than market suggests |
| 13 | Lions | 10.5 | Under | Medium-High | 6th | Strong roster but priced near ceiling | Schedule and market expectations leave less room for error |
| 14 | Jets | 8.5 | Over | Medium-High | 19th | Added more offensive talent | Middle-tier line gives them room if QB play is merely solid |
| 15 | Raiders | 6.5 | Over | Medium-High | 23rd | Offensive reset creates some upside | A low baseline means competent QB play can swing this over |
| 16 | Titans | 5.5 | Over | Medium-High | 28th | Youth injection and rebuild growth | One of the friendlier schedule paths among lower-tier teams |
| 17 | Steelers | 8.5 | Under | Medium | 4th | Usual defensive backbone remains | Difficult slate makes a winning season harder to bank on |
| 18 | Texans | 9.5 | Under | Medium | 10th | Core remains promising | Market may be pricing near best-case rather than median outcome |
| 19 | Packers | 9.5 | Over | Medium | 17th | Young core still ascending | 10 wins is attainable if offensive growth continues |
| 20 | Seahawks | 7.5 | Over | Medium | 25th | QB and offensive structure give them a chance | Schedule relief matters at this number |
| 21 | Buccaneers | 8.5 | Over | Medium | 15th | Continuity helps keep floor intact | Solid path to 9 wins in a relatively manageable range |
| 22 | Broncos | 8.5 | Under | Medium | 11th | Still building offensive consistency | Number asks for a cleaner profile than they may have |
| 23 | Jaguars | 8.5 | Under | Medium | 12th | Still trying to stabilize offensive identity | Too much inconsistency risk for 9+ wins confidence |
| 24 | Colts | 7.5 | Under | Medium | 13th | Outcome tied heavily to offensive development | A volatile offense can sink this number quickly |
| 25 | Chargers | 9.5 | Over | Medium | 14th | High-end QB talent keeps ceiling alive | Thin edge, but QB play gives them a path to 10 |
| 26 | Rams | 9.5 | Under | Medium | 3rd | Veteran core still dangerous | Tough schedule makes this feel a bit rich |
| 27 | Commanders | 7.5 | Over | Medium-Low | 29th | Young offense keeps trending up | Soft slate helps, though overall volatility remains |
| 28 | Browns | 6.5 | Under | Medium-Low | 2nd | Quarterback uncertainty remains central | Hard to trust a difficult schedule with offensive questions |
| 29 | Falcons | 8.5 | Under | Medium-Low | 1st | Talent is intriguing but schedule is brutal | Toughest slate creates little margin |
| 30 | Eagles | 10.5 | Over | Medium-Low | 30th | Strong overall roster core remains | Number is fair, but roster ceiling still supports 11 |
| 31 | Vikings | 7.5 | Over | Low | 31st | Wide outcome range | Friendly schedule makes over viable despite uncertainty |
| 32 | Cardinals | 7.5 | Under | Low | 32nd | Rebuild still incomplete | Easy schedule helps, but roster still may not be ready |
*SOS Rank here is shown from hardest to easiest overall outlook context, where 1st = hardest and 32nd = easiest.
| Team | Line | Why I Like It |
|---|---|---|
| Chiefs | 11.5 | Elite QB/coaching stability keeps the floor extremely high |
| 49ers | 10.5 | Strong roster depth and proven winning infrastructure |
| Bills | 10.5 | Josh Allen alone keeps them live for 12+ wins |
| Panthers | 6.5 | Low line with room for normal young-team improvement |
| Patriots | 7.5 | Reachable number if the offense becomes merely average |
| Team | Line | Why I Like It |
|---|---|---|
| Dolphins | 9.5 | Tougher schedule plus volatility makes double digits harder |
| Cowboys | 9.5 | Strong number for a team with less margin than public perception suggests |
| Ravens | 11.5 | Great team, but 12 wins is a high hurdle |
| Bengals | 10.5 | Market price feels close to ceiling outcome |
| Lions | 10.5 | Elite team, but line leaves limited room for regression or injuries |
If I were narrowing this to the best 5 win total bets right now, I’d start with:
If you want less public, more market-resistance style plays:
If you want, I can turn this into:
Create a 2026 auction draft value chart for a 12-tem PPR league with a $200 budget. Show the top 30 mos expensive players with their projected auction pric, position, tier, projected PPR points, value rating(overpay/fair/steal), and the optimal budget allocaton by position. Include a strategy section on nominaion tactics.
For a 12-team PPR league with a $200 budget, the right way to think about auction values is not just raw projections, but also scarcity, replacement-level drop-off, and how aggressively your room usually spends on elite RBs and WRs.
In a typical 12-team PPR auction, the most efficient budget shape is usually:
That means your best builds are often:
| Position | Recommended Budget | Percent of Budget | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| QB | $16-$20 | 8-10% | Usually one strong starter, avoid overpaying for QB1 overall |
| RB | $60-$70 | 30-35% | Enough for one anchor plus depth, or multiple mid-tier values |
| WR | $80-$90 | 40-45% | PPR leagues reward WR volume most consistently |
| TE | $16-$20 | 8-10% | Either buy elite or stay cheap |
| Bench/Flex Cushion | $10-$20 | 5-10% | Preserve flexibility late when room gets broke |
| Rank | Player | Pos | Projected Price | Tier | Projected PPR Points | Value Rating | Auction Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ja'Marr Chase | WR | $61 | Tier 1 Elite | 326 | Fair | Expensive but worthy WR1 anchor |
| 2 | Justin Jefferson | WR | $59 | Tier 1 Elite | 320 | Fair | Safe elite-volume PPR investment |
| 3 | CeeDee Lamb | WR | $58 | Tier 1 Elite | 317 | Fair | High target floor keeps him premium |
| 4 | Bijan Robinson | RB | $57 | Tier 1 Elite | 309 | Fair | RB1 ceiling with full-skill-set upside |
| 5 | Jahmyr Gibbs | RB | $55 | Tier 1 Elite | 301 | Fair | Elite PPR RB profile |
| 6 | Amon-Ra St. Brown | WR | $54 | Tier 1 Elite | 304 | Steal | Often slightly cheaper than the top 3 WRs |
| 7 | Puka Nacua | WR | $52 | Tier 1 Elite | 296 | Fair | Target-heavy profile works perfectly in PPR |
| 8 | Saquon Barkley | RB | $51 | Tier 1 Elite | 294 | Fair | Win-now auction hammer if room doesn't push too hard |
| 9 | Malik Nabers | WR | $49 | Tier 2 Anchor | 289 | Steal | Can return first-round WR output at slight discount |
| 10 | A.J. Brown | WR | $47 | Tier 2 Anchor | 282 | Fair | Slightly lower floor than target-hog tier |
| 11 | Breece Hall | RB | $46 | Tier 2 Anchor | 279 | Fair | Strong dual-threat profile in PPR |
| 12 | Brian Thomas Jr. | WR | $44 | Tier 2 Anchor | 274 | Steal | Upside can outproduce current sticker price |
| 13 | Jonathan Taylor | RB | $43 | Tier 2 Anchor | 270 | Fair | More sensitive to game script than top PPR RBs |
| 14 | Drake London | WR | $42 | Tier 2 Anchor | 268 | Steal | Reliable target volume candidate |
| 15 | Nico Collins | WR | $40 | Tier 2 Anchor | 262 | Fair | Volatile but high-end weekly upside |
| 16 | Achané | RB | $39 | Tier 2 Upside | 258 | Steal | Massive weekly ceiling in PPR formats |
| 17 | Garrett Wilson | WR | $38 | Tier 2 Upside | 256 | Steal | Strong candidate to beat price in volume |
| 18 | Josh Jacobs | RB | $37 | Tier 2 Upside | 252 | Fair | Touchdown and workload keep him priced high |
| 19 | Brock Bowers | TE | $35 | Tier 1 Elite TE | 249 | Fair | Premium edge at thin position |
| 20 | Tyreek Hill | WR | $34 | Tier 3 Win-Now | 246 | Steal | Age discount creates buying opportunity |
| 21 | Ladd McConkey | WR | $33 | Tier 3 Win-Now | 243 | Steal | Excellent PPR profile if volume holds |
| 22 | Josh Allen | QB | $32 | Tier 1 Elite QB | 408 | Fair | Premium QB ceiling, but opportunity cost matters |
| 23 | Jalen Hurts | QB | $30 | Tier 1 Elite QB | 399 | Fair | Worth it if room lets him sit here |
| 24 | Travis Kelce | TE | $28 | Tier 2 TE | 221 | Fair | Still commands cost based on weekly edge |
| 25 | Davante Adams | WR | $27 | Tier 3 Win-Now | 232 | Steal | Veteran discount can be useful in contending builds |
| 26 | Joe Burrow | QB | $26 | Tier 2 QB | 377 | Fair | Better if paired with cheaper skill anchors |
| 27 | Kenneth Walker III | RB | $25 | Tier 3 RB | 226 | Fair | Volatility makes exact price important |
| 28 | Trey McBride | TE | $24 | Tier 2 TE | 219 | Steal | Often the best elite-TE alternative |
| 29 | DeVonta Smith | WR | $23 | Tier 3 WR | 224 | Steal | Frequently undervalued in PPR due to team context |
| 30 | Lamar Jackson | QB | $22 | Tier 2 QB | 371 | Steal | If QB spending stays muted, he's a bargain |
These are the players worth paying full freight for if you want a cornerstone.
These are often the best blend of ceiling and price efficiency.
These are often room-dependent values when managers chase youth or name-brand elites.
Budget shape:
Best for:
Budget shape:
Best for:
Budget shape:
Best for:
Nominate players you do not want but expect the room to chase.
Good early nominations:
Why:
This is where the auction is usually won.
Focus on:
Best middle-game tactic:
Once the room is broke:
Late auction edge comes from:
| Player | Why |
|---|---|
| Josh Allen | Elite, but QB1 pricing can be hard to justify in 1-QB |
| Jalen Hurts | Similar issue: great player, difficult opportunity cost |
| Travis Kelce | Fine pick, but age and price can push him into thin-margin territory |
| Kenneth Walker III | Name value can outpace PPR consistency |
| Jonathan Taylor | Strong player, but price can exceed pass-game role |
| Player | Why |
|---|---|
| Amon-Ra St. Brown | Often priced just below the top elite tier despite similar PPR case |
| Malik Nabers | Ceiling outcome is worth more than sticker price |
| Brian Thomas Jr. | Can leap into true WR1 territory |
| Trey McBride | Strong TE edge without paying absolute TE1 tax |
| DeVonta Smith | Often discounted too much because of target competition |
For a 12-team PPR $200 auction, the sharpest default plan is:
The best-balanced builds usually come from leaving the draft with:
If you want, I can also build: